NBOS vs VTI
Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, NBOS or VTI?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NBOS led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBOS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $572M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.02% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 31 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +11.31% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.13%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.6%Best | 12.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.7%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $13,953 | $16,078Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 29, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 29, 2024 to Oct 2, 2026 (2.7 years).
NBOS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
NBOS vs VTI Performance
Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBOS returned +16.13% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, NBOS is up 11.31% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.1% compared with 5.6% for NBOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.7% for NBOS and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBOS charges 0.57% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $3 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBOS currently yields 8.02% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 9 holdings in NBOS and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 100.0% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, NBOS as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 9 positions we hold weights for in NBOS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 31 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for NBOS (97.5% of the fund), and 9 for NBOS that do not appear in VTI (100.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NBOS and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBOS or VTI?
NBOS has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NBOS or VTI?
Over the past year NBOS returned +16.13% vs +15.92% for VTI, so NBOS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NBOS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.1% annualized versus 5.6% for NBOS. Worst drawdown: NBOS -12.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both NBOS and VTI?
NBOS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBOS or VTI?
NBOS yields 8.02% while VTI yields 1.03%, so NBOS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than NBOS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NBOS led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.