NCPB vs QQQ

NCPB vs QQQ

Which is better, NCPB or QQQ?

QQQ has been ahead.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNCPBQQQ
Expense Ratio0.31%0.18%Best
AUM$54M$498.6B
Dividend Yield5.32%0.42%
Holdings976321
YTD Return-2.30%+21.44%Best
1Y Return-1.20%+23.58%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+27.86%
5Y Return (annualized)-+16.25%
Volatility (annualized)4.7%Best17.4%
Max Drawdown-4.4%Best-22.8%
$10,000 over 2.6 years$11,280$17,260Best
Fund FamilyNuveenInvesco (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
Style-Large Cap Growth
InceptionMar 5, 2024Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 6, 2024 to Oct 1, 2026 (2.6 years).

NCPB vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.

NCPB vs QQQ Performance

Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) is an ETF from Nuveen and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year NCPB returned -1.20% while QQQ returned +23.58%. Year to date, NCPB is down 2.30% versus a gain of 21.44% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 4.7% for NCPB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.4% for NCPB and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NCPB charges 0.31% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $31 vs $18 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NCPB currently yields 5.32% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 318 holdings in NCPB and 102 in QQQ, totalling 62.7% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 318 positions we hold weights for in NCPB and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 976 and 321.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NCPB and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NCPBQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NCPB or QQQ?

NCPB has an expense ratio of 0.31% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NCPB or QQQ?

Over the past year NCPB returned -1.20% vs +23.58% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NCPB or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 4.7% for NCPB. Worst drawdown: NCPB -4.4% vs QQQ -22.8%.

Should I hold both NCPB and QQQ?

NCPB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, NCPB or QQQ?

NCPB yields 5.32% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so NCPB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than NCPB?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.