NFEB vs VTI
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NFEB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $83M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.17% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.27% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
NFEB vs VTI Performance
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February (NFEB) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NFEB returned +15.27% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, NFEB is up 9.17% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 9.1% for NFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.3% for NFEB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NFEB charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NFEB currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NFEB or VTI?
NFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NFEB or VTI?
Over the past year NFEB returned +15.27% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NFEB annualized +14.63% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NFEB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 9.1% for NFEB. Worst drawdown: NFEB -13.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NFEB and VTI?
NFEB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, NFEB or VTI?
NFEB yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.