NHYB vs VTI

NHYB vs VTI

Which is better, NHYB or VTI?

High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns (1Y): VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNHYBVTI
Expense Ratio0.08%0.03%Best
AUM$1.8B$666.9B
Dividend Yield5.42%1.03%
Holdings1,6843,543
YTD Return+2.17%+12.57%Best
1Y Return+3.63%+17.22%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.87%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.86%
Volatility (annualized)3.4%Best13.0%
Fund FamilyNuveenVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleHigh Yield BondLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 23, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

NHYB vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

NHYB vs VTI Performance

Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB) is an ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NHYB returned +3.63% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, NHYB is up 2.17% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.0% compared with 3.4% for NHYB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NHYB charges 0.08% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NHYB currently yields 5.42% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 3 holdings in NHYB and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 0.6% and 90.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in NHYB and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 1,684 and 3,543.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NHYB and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NHYBVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NHYB or VTI?

NHYB has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NHYB or VTI?

Over the past year NHYB returned +3.63% vs +17.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NHYB or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 13.0% annualized versus 3.4% for NHYB.

Should I hold both NHYB and VTI?

NHYB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, NHYB or VTI?

NHYB yields 5.42% while VTI yields 1.03%, so NHYB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than NHYB?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.