NUIB vs RSBT
Nuveen Impact Bond ETF vs Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
Which is better, NUIB or RSBT?
NUIB costs less.
NUIB has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUIB | RSBT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37%Best | 1.01% |
| AUM | $45M | $165M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.95% |
| Holdings | 58 | 34 |
| YTD Return | +0.11% | +7.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +5.38% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +4.45% |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Return Stacked ETF |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2026 | Feb 7, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight, Style.
NUIB vs RSBT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NUIB vs RSBT Performance
Nuveen Impact Bond ETF (NUIB) is an ETF from Nuveen and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) is an ETF from Return Stacked ETF. Year to date, NUIB is up 0.11% versus a gain of 7.13% for RSBT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUIB charges 0.37% per year while RSBT charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $101 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUIB currently yields 0.00% against 2.95% for RSBT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 58 holdings in NUIB and 2 in RSBT, totalling 64.0% and 90.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in NUIB and 2 in RSBT, against full books of 58 and 34.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NUIB and RSBT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUIB or RSBT?
NUIB has an expense ratio of 0.37% while RSBT charges 1.01%. NUIB is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUIB or RSBT?
NUIB yields 0.00% while RSBT yields 2.95%, so RSBT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSBT better than NUIB?
NUIB has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.