NVDQ vs SPY
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, NVDQ or SPY?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.63, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVDQ | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $19M | $804.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 5 | 505 |
| YTD Return | -45.03% | +12.47%Best |
| 1Y Return | -57.10% | +17.51%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -83.08% | +21.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.5% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $58 | $18,552Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2023 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 19, 2023 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.9 years).
NVDQ vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
NVDQ vs SPY Performance
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) is an ETF from REX Shares and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year NVDQ returned -57.10% while SPY returned +17.51%. Year to date, NVDQ is down 45.03% versus a gain of 12.47% for SPY.
Over three years, NVDQ compounded at -83.08% per year against +21.18% for SPY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVDQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.5% compared with 12.4% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.63. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVDQ charges 1.05% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $9 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVDQ currently yields 0.49% against 0.98% for SPY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NVDQ and SPY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVDQ or SPY?
NVDQ has an expense ratio of 1.05% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $96 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NVDQ or SPY?
Over the past year NVDQ returned -57.10% vs +17.51% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NVDQ or SPY?
NVDQ has been the more volatile fund at 58.5% annualized versus 12.4% for SPY.
Should I hold both NVDQ and SPY?
NVDQ and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of -0.63, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVDQ or SPY?
NVDQ yields 0.49% while SPY yields 0.98%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than NVDQ?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.63, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.