NVIB vs QQQ
Direxion NVDA Defined Income Boost ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, NVIB or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVIB | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 3 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +16.48% | +21.22%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +23.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +28.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.82% |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 29, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NVIB vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NVIB vs QQQ Performance
Direxion NVDA Defined Income Boost ETF (NVIB) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, NVIB is up 16.48% versus a gain of 21.22% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVIB charges 0.97% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $18 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVIB currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 8.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings NVIB also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NVIB, our book for it covers 98.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
QQQ and NVIB share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in NVIB and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 3 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 3 and 102 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 95 positions NVIB does not, 89.1% of the fund.
Largest: AAPL 7.27%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 4.67%, MU 4.43%, AMD 3.45%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NVIB | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.14% | 8.44% | 0.70% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NVIB and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVIB or QQQ?
NVIB has an expense ratio of 0.97% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $79 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NVIB and QQQ?
At least 8.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings NVIB also owns. Our book for NVIB is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in NVIB and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVIB or QQQ?
NVIB yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than NVIB?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.