NVYY vs SCHD
GraniteShares YieldBoost NVDA ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, NVYY or SCHD?
Option Writing against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. NVYY led over the full window, SCHD over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVYY | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $30M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 122.46% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 6 | 103 |
| YTD Return | -0.85% | +24.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.79% | +28.14%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.90% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.8% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.9% | -4.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $14,652Best | $13,439 |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 12, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 13, 2025 to Sep 10, 2026 (1.3 years).
NVYY vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
NVYY vs SCHD Performance
GraniteShares YieldBoost NVDA ETF (NVYY) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year NVYY returned +5.79% while SCHD returned +28.14%. Year to date, NVYY is down 0.85% versus a gain of 24.59% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVYY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.8% compared with 12.4% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.9% for NVYY and -4.6% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.04. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVYY charges 1.15% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $6 annually, a gap of $109 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVYY currently yields 122.46% against 3.00% for SCHD.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NVYY and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVYY or SCHD?
NVYY has an expense ratio of 1.15% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $109 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NVYY or SCHD?
Over the past year NVYY returned +5.79% vs +28.14% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), NVYY annualized +34.16% vs +25.53% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NVYY or SCHD?
NVYY has been the more volatile fund at 26.8% annualized versus 12.4% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: NVYY -14.9% vs SCHD -4.6%.
Should I hold both NVYY and SCHD?
NVYY and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.04, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVYY or SCHD?
NVYY yields 122.46% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so NVYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than NVYY?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. NVYY led over the full window, SCHD over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.