OBND vs VTI
State Street Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OBND | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $57M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.27% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 438 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -2.02% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.25% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.52% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.3% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
OBND vs VTI Performance
State Street Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF (OBND) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OBND returned +0.25% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, OBND is down 2.02% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, OBND compounded at +5.52% per year against +21.51% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +1.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 6.3% for OBND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.9% for OBND and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OBND charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OBND currently yields 6.27% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
OBND and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OBND | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BX | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OBND or VTI?
OBND has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OBND or VTI?
Over the past year OBND returned +0.25% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), OBND annualized +1.54% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OBND or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 6.3% for OBND. Worst drawdown: OBND -15.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both OBND and VTI?
OBND and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OBND and VTI?
OBND and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OBND or VTI?
OBND yields 6.27% while VTI yields 1.07%, so OBND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.