OBOR vs VTI
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OBOR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.96% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 127 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +2.97% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.34% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.69% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.97% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
OBOR vs VTI Performance
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OBOR returned +15.34% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, OBOR is up 2.97% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, OBOR compounded at +11.69% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.97% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +3.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OBOR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.5% for OBOR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OBOR charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OBOR currently yields 1.96% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
OBOR and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2901 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OBOR or VTI?
OBOR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OBOR or VTI?
Over the past year OBOR returned +15.34% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), OBOR annualized +3.71% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OBOR or VTI?
OBOR has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: OBOR -41.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both OBOR and VTI?
OBOR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OBOR and VTI?
OBOR and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2901 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OBOR or VTI?
OBOR yields 1.96% while VTI yields 1.07%, so OBOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.