OCTW vs VTI
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OCTW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $323M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +6.92% | +13.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.81% | +19.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.60% | +20.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.18% | +11.75% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
OCTW vs VTI Performance
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) is a ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OCTW returned +9.81% while VTI returned +19.90%. Year to date, OCTW is up 6.92% versus a gain of 13.48% for VTI.
Over three years, OCTW compounded at +10.60% per year against +20.94% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.18% and +11.75% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, OCTW has the edge at +9.08% annualized vs +8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 5.1% for OCTW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.4% for OCTW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OCTW charges 0.74% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OCTW currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OCTW or VTI?
OCTW has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OCTW or VTI?
Over the past year OCTW returned +9.81% vs +19.90% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), OCTW annualized +9.08% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OCTW or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 5.1% for OCTW. Worst drawdown: OCTW -8.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both OCTW and VTI?
OCTW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, OCTW or VTI?
OCTW yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.