OCTZ vs QQQ
Trueshares Structured Outcome (October) ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 107 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OCTZ | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $43M | $486.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.04% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 21 | 107 | |
| YTD Return | +9.42% | +17.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.07% | +27.33% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.67% | +24.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.23% | +14.22% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
OCTZ vs QQQ Performance
Trueshares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year OCTZ returned +11.07% while QQQ returned +27.33%. Year to date, OCTZ is up 9.42% versus a gain of 17.18% for QQQ.
Over three years, OCTZ compounded at +13.67% per year against +24.55% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.23% and +14.22% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.04% annualized vs +12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 11.4% for OCTZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.8% for OCTZ and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OCTZ charges 0.79% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $18 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OCTZ currently yields 2.04% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
OCTZ and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OCTZ or QQQ?
OCTZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OCTZ or QQQ?
Over the past year OCTZ returned +11.07% vs +27.33% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), OCTZ annualized +12.06% vs +13.04% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OCTZ or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 11.4% for OCTZ. Worst drawdown: OCTZ -15.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both OCTZ and QQQ?
OCTZ and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between OCTZ and QQQ?
OCTZ and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OCTZ or QQQ?
OCTZ yields 2.04% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so OCTZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.