PAB vs QQQ

PAB vs QQQ

Which is better, PAB or QQQ?

QQQ has been ahead.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPABQQQ
Expense Ratio0.19%0.18%Best
AUM$98M$483.5B
Dividend Yield5.31%0.44%
Holdings436107
YTD Return-1.28%+16.87%Best
1Y Return-0.63%+22.98%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+4.39%+24.98%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-0.49%+14.39%Best
Volatility (annualized)6.4%Best20.4%
Max Drawdown-19.3%Best-35.1%
$10,000 over 5 years$9,757$19,586Best
Fund FamilyPGIM InvestmentsInvesco (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
Style-Large Cap Growth
InceptionApr 12, 2021Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 15, 2021 to Sep 11, 2026 (5.4 years).

PAB vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.4 years both funds cover.

PAB vs QQQ Performance

PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year PAB returned -0.63% while QQQ returned +22.98%. Year to date, PAB is down 1.28% versus a gain of 16.87% for QQQ.

Over three years, PAB compounded at +4.39% per year against +24.98% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -0.49% and +14.39% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 6.4% for PAB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for PAB and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PAB charges 0.19% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $18 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PAB currently yields 5.31% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 287 holdings in PAB and 102 in QQQ, totalling 63.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 287 positions we hold weights for in PAB and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 436 and 107.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PAB and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PABQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PAB or QQQ?

PAB has an expense ratio of 0.19% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PAB or QQQ?

Over the past year PAB returned -0.63% vs +22.98% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PAB or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 6.4% for PAB. Worst drawdown: PAB -19.3% vs QQQ -35.1%.

Should I hold both PAB and QQQ?

PAB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PAB or QQQ?

PAB yields 5.31% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so PAB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than PAB?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.