PANG vs VYM
Leverage Shares 2X Long PANW Daily ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PANG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PANG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $14M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.44% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +204.80% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +168.18% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 132.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 21, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PANG vs VYM Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long PANW Daily ETF (PANG) is a ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PANG returned +168.18% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, PANG is up 204.80% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PANG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 132.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.4% for PANG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.13. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PANG charges 0.76% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $4 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PANG currently yields 4.44% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PANG and VYM share 0 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PANG or VYM?
PANG has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PANG or VYM?
Over the past year PANG returned +168.18% vs +22.16% for VYM, so PANG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), PANG annualized +86.30% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PANG or VYM?
PANG has been the more volatile fund at 132.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PANG -62.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PANG and VYM?
PANG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.13, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PANG and VYM?
PANG and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PANG or VYM?
PANG yields 4.44% while VYM yields 2.24%, so PANG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.