PATN vs SAWS
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PATN | SAWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $194M | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 0.02% | |
| Holdings | 106 | 72 | |
| YTD Return | +30.58% | +16.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +51.85% | +20.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.1% | 18.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.8% | -22.0% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2024 | Jul 30, 2024 |
PATN vs SAWS Performance
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year PATN returned +51.85% while SAWS returned +20.06%. Year to date, PATN is up 30.58% versus a gain of 16.31% for SAWS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PATN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 18.3% for SAWS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.8% for PATN and -22.0% for SAWS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PATN charges 0.65% per year while SAWS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $55 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PATN currently yields 1.59% against 0.02% for SAWS.
Holdings Overlap
PATN and SAWS share 0 holdings out of 172 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PATN or SAWS?
PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SAWS charges 0.55%. SAWS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PATN or SAWS?
Over the past year PATN returned +51.85% vs +20.06% for SAWS, so PATN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PATN annualized +38.32% vs +13.54% for SAWS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PATN or SAWS?
PATN has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 18.3% for SAWS. Worst drawdown: PATN -16.8% vs SAWS -22.0%.
Should I hold both PATN and SAWS?
PATN and SAWS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PATN and SAWS?
PATN and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 172 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PATN or SAWS?
PATN yields 1.59% while SAWS yields 0.02%, so PATN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.