PATN vs VTI
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PATN or VTI?
PATN has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PATN led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PATN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $287M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 108 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +28.78%Best | +12.28% |
| 1Y Return | +42.17%Best | +16.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.7% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.8%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $18,276Best | $13,837 |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.8% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 17, 2024 to Sep 17, 2026 (2 years).
PATN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
PATN vs VTI Performance
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PATN returned +42.17% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, PATN is up 28.78% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PATN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 13.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.8% for PATN and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PATN charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PATN currently yields 1.67% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 98 holdings in PATN and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 97.2% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in PATN and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 108 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PATN (97.5% of the fund), and 4 for PATN that do not appear in VTI (1.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PATN and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PATN or VTI?
PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PATN or VTI?
Over the past year PATN returned +42.17% vs +16.78% for VTI, so PATN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PATN annualized +35.19% vs +17.63% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PATN or VTI?
PATN has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 13.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PATN -16.8% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both PATN and VTI?
PATN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PATN or VTI?
PATN yields 1.67% while VTI yields 1.03%, so PATN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PATN?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PATN led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.