PBFB vs PBJA
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - February vs PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - January
Which is better, PBFB or PBJA?
Each has led over a different period.
PBFB led over 1Y, PBJA over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBFB | PBJA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $41M | $66M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 14 | 14 |
| YTD Return | +7.93%Best | +7.61% |
| 1Y Return | +10.78%Best | +10.35% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.4% | 4.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.7% | -8.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $13,056 | $13,123Best |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Feb 1, 2024 | Dec 29, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 1, 2024 to Oct 12, 2026 (2.7 years).
PBFB vs PBJA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
PBFB vs PBJA Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year PBFB returned +10.78% while PBJA returned +10.35%. Year to date, PBFB is up 7.93% versus a gain of 7.61% for PBJA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBFB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4.4% compared with 4.3% for PBJA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.7% for PBFB and -8.5% for PBJA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBFB charges 0.50% per year while PBJA charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, PBFB currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PBJA.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PBFB and PBJA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBFB or PBJA?
PBFB has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PBJA charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, PBFB or PBJA?
Over the past year PBFB returned +10.78% vs +10.35% for PBJA, so PBFB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PBFB or PBJA?
PBFB has been the more volatile fund at 4.4% annualized versus 4.3% for PBJA. Worst drawdown: PBFB -8.7% vs PBJA -8.5%.
Should I hold both PBFB and PBJA?
PBFB and PBJA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBFB or PBJA?
PBFB yields 0.00% while PBJA yields 0.00%, so PBJA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PBJA better than PBFB?
PBFB led over 1Y, PBJA over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.