PBFR vs SPY
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBFR | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $201M | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 15 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +6.49% | +13.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.59% | +21.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.44% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2024 | Jan 22, 1993 |
PBFR vs SPY Performance
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) is a ETF from PGIM Investments and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year PBFR returned +10.59% while SPY returned +21.53%. Year to date, PBFR is up 6.49% versus a gain of 13.68% for SPY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 4.3% for PBFR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.5% for PBFR and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBFR charges 0.50% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $9 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBFR currently yields 0.01% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
PBFR and SPY share 0 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBFR or SPY?
PBFR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PBFR or SPY?
Over the past year PBFR returned +10.59% vs +21.53% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PBFR annualized +10.50% vs +8.85% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PBFR or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 4.3% for PBFR. Worst drawdown: PBFR -8.5% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both PBFR and SPY?
PBFR and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between PBFR and SPY?
PBFR and SPY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBFR or SPY?
PBFR yields 0.01% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.