PBMR vs VTI

PBMR vs VTI

Which is better, PBMR or VTI?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPBMRVTI
Expense Ratio0.50%0.03%Best
AUM$36M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings83,543
YTD Return+7.79%+13.60%Best
1Y Return+10.58%+18.17%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.04%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.14%
Volatility (annualized)4.4%Best12.3%
Max Drawdown-7.6%Best-19.3%
$10,000 over 2.6 years$13,111$15,459Best
Fund FamilyPGIM InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 29, 2024May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 1, 2024 to Sep 25, 2026 (2.6 years).

PBMR vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.

PBMR vs VTI Performance

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - March (PBMR) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PBMR returned +10.58% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, PBMR is up 7.79% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 4.4% for PBMR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.6% for PBMR and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PBMR charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBMR currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PBMR and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PBMRVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PBMR or VTI?

PBMR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PBMR or VTI?

Over the past year PBMR returned +10.58% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PBMR or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 4.4% for PBMR. Worst drawdown: PBMR -7.6% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both PBMR and VTI?

PBMR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PBMR or VTI?

PBMR yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than PBMR?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.