PCHI vs QQQ

PCHI vs QQQ

Which is better, PCHI or QQQ?

High Yield Bond against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPCHIQQQ
Expense Ratio0.56%0.18%Best
AUM$22M$483.5B
Dividend Yield7.69%0.44%
Holdings136107
YTD Return+0.89%+17.95%Best
1Y Return+1.36%+21.77%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+25.63%
5Y Return (annualized)-+15.24%
Volatility (annualized)3.4%Best19.1%
Max Drawdown-6.4%Best-15.7%
$10,000 over 1.5 years$10,597$14,769Best
Fund FamilyPolen CapitalInvesco (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleHigh Yield BondLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 25, 2025Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 25, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.5 years).

PCHI vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.

PCHI vs QQQ Performance

Polen High Income ETF (PCHI) is an ETF from Polen Capital and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year PCHI returned +1.36% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, PCHI is up 0.89% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 3.4% for PCHI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.4% for PCHI and -15.7% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PCHI charges 0.56% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $18 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCHI currently yields 7.69% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 87 holdings in PCHI and 102 in QQQ, totalling 63.9% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in PCHI and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 136 and 107.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PCHI and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PCHIQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PCHI or QQQ?

PCHI has an expense ratio of 0.56% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PCHI or QQQ?

Over the past year PCHI returned +1.36% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PCHI annualized +3.94% vs +29.69% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PCHI or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 3.4% for PCHI. Worst drawdown: PCHI -6.4% vs QQQ -15.7%.

Should I hold both PCHI and QQQ?

PCHI and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PCHI or QQQ?

PCHI yields 7.69% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so PCHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than PCHI?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.