PDDL vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PDDL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -50.16% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | -55.18% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 63.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -76.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 15, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
PDDL vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (PDDL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PDDL returned -55.18% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, PDDL is down 50.16% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PDDL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 63.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.1% for PDDL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.09. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PDDL charges 1.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PDDL currently yields 0.65% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PDDL and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PDDL or VTI?
PDDL has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PDDL or VTI?
Over the past year PDDL returned -55.18% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), PDDL annualized -41.32% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PDDL or VTI?
PDDL has been the more volatile fund at 63.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PDDL -76.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PDDL and VTI?
PDDL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.09, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PDDL and VTI?
PDDL and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PDDL or VTI?
PDDL yields 0.65% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.