PMAU vs VTI
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PMAU | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +4.57% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.12% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
PMAU vs VTI Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU) is a ETF from PGIM Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PMAU returned +7.12% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, PMAU is up 4.57% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 2.5% for PMAU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for PMAU and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PMAU charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PMAU currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PMAU or VTI?
PMAU has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PMAU or VTI?
Over the past year PMAU returned +7.12% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), PMAU annualized +7.29% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PMAU or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 2.5% for PMAU. Worst drawdown: PMAU -1.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PMAU and VTI?
PMAU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, PMAU or VTI?
PMAU yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.