PPLT vs VYM

PPLT vs VYM

Which is better, PPLT or VYM?

Precious Metals against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. PPLT led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VYM over the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPPLTVYM
Expense Ratio0.60%0.04%Best
AUM$2.2B$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings1613
YTD Return-16.14%+11.35%Best
1Y Return+29.29%Best+15.34%
3Y Return (annualized)+23.34%Best+17.22%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.87%Best+12.30%
Volatility (annualized)23.5%13.2%Best
Max Drawdown-70.7%-35.7%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$19,145Best$17,861
Fund FamilyAberdeenVanguard (US)
CategoryCommodityEquity
StylePrecious MetalsLarge Cap Value
InceptionJan 8, 2010Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 8, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (16.7 years).

PPLT vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.7 years both funds cover.

PPLT vs VYM Performance

abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) is an ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PPLT returned +29.29% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, PPLT is down 16.14% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.

Over three years, PPLT compounded at +23.34% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.87% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.89% annualized vs +0.15%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PPLT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 13.2% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.7% for PPLT and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PPLT charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PPLT currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PPLT and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PPLTVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PPLT or VYM?

PPLT has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PPLT or VYM?

Over the past year PPLT returned +29.29% vs +15.34% for VYM, so PPLT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), PPLT annualized +0.15% vs +9.89% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PPLT or VYM?

PPLT has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 13.2% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PPLT -70.7% vs VYM -35.7%.

Should I hold both PPLT and VYM?

PPLT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PPLT or VYM?

PPLT yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than PPLT?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. PPLT led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VYM over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.