PSCW vs VTI
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PSCW or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCW | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $61M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +9.24% | +11.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.05% | +17.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.30% | +20.35%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.21% | +11.72%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.8%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.9%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,164 | $17,404Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 1, 2021 to Sep 10, 2026 (5.4 years).
PSCW vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.4 years both funds cover.
PSCW vs VTI Performance
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCW returned +12.05% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, PSCW is up 9.24% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Over three years, PSCW compounded at +11.30% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.21% and +11.72% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 6.8% for PSCW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.9% for PSCW and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCW charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCW currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in PSCW and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 0.3% and 90.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, PSCW as of Sep 1, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in PSCW and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 6 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PSCW and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCW or VTI?
PSCW has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSCW or VTI?
Over the past year PSCW returned +12.05% vs +17.34% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSCW or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 6.8% for PSCW. Worst drawdown: PSCW -11.9% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both PSCW and VTI?
PSCW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCW or VTI?
PSCW yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PSCW?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.