PSFO vs VYM
Pacer Swan SOS Flex October ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSFO | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $38M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +9.07% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.32% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.61% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PSFO vs VYM Performance
Pacer Swan SOS Flex October ETF (PSFO) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSFO returned +15.32% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, PSFO is up 9.07% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, PSFO compounded at +12.61% per year against +18.25% for VYM. Across the full 5-year window we track, PSFO has the edge at +11.71% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 8.5% for PSFO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.1% for PSFO and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSFO charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSFO currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PSFO and VYM share 0 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSFO or VYM?
PSFO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSFO or VYM?
Over the past year PSFO returned +15.32% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), PSFO annualized +11.71% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSFO or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 8.5% for PSFO. Worst drawdown: PSFO -12.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PSFO and VYM?
PSFO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSFO and VYM?
PSFO and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSFO or VYM?
PSFO yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.