PSMJ vs VTI

PSMJ vs VTI

Which is better, PSMJ or VTI?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPSMJVTI
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%Best
AUM$100M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings63,543
YTD Return+5.93%+12.08%Best
1Y Return+8.67%+16.31%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+12.87%+20.83%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+10.48%+11.89%Best
Volatility (annualized)7.9%Best15.9%
Max Drawdown-10.9%Best-25.4%
$10,000 over 5 years$16,460$17,537Best
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 30, 2021May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2021 to Sep 14, 2026 (5.2 years).

PSMJ vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.

PSMJ vs VTI Performance

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate July ETF (PSMJ) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSMJ returned +8.67% while VTI returned +16.31%. Year to date, PSMJ is up 5.93% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.

Over three years, PSMJ compounded at +12.87% per year against +20.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.48% and +11.89% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 7.9% for PSMJ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.9% for PSMJ and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PSMJ charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSMJ currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in PSMJ and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 0.8% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in PSMJ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 6 and 3,543.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PSMJ and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PSMJVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PSMJ or VTI?

PSMJ has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PSMJ or VTI?

Over the past year PSMJ returned +8.67% vs +16.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PSMJ or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 7.9% for PSMJ. Worst drawdown: PSMJ -10.9% vs VTI -25.4%.

Should I hold both PSMJ and VTI?

PSMJ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PSMJ or VTI?

PSMJ yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than PSMJ?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.