PTA vs QQQ
Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities & Income Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. PTA offers more diversification with 283 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PTA | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.01% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | - | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.91% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 283 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +1.08% | +17.07% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.04% | +26.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.23% | +26.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.10% | +15.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
PTA vs QQQ Performance
Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities & Income Fund (PTA) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year PTA returned -0.04% while QQQ returned +26.39%. Year to date, PTA is up 1.08% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Over three years, PTA compounded at +10.23% per year against +26.08% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +2.10% and +15.18% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.05% annualized vs +2.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.6% for PTA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.7% for PTA and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PTA charges 2.01% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $201 vs $18 annually, a gap of $183 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PTA currently yields 7.91% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
PTA and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 269 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PTA or QQQ?
PTA has an expense ratio of 2.01% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $183 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PTA or QQQ?
Over the past year PTA returned -0.04% vs +26.39% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), PTA annualized +2.71% vs +13.05% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PTA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.6% for PTA. Worst drawdown: PTA -28.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both PTA and QQQ?
PTA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PTA and QQQ?
PTA and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 269 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PTA or QQQ?
PTA yields 7.91% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so PTA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.