QAI vs VYM
NYLIM Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, QAI or VYM?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QAI | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.88% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.39% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 129 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +7.14% | +11.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.07% | +15.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.00% | +17.22%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.15% | +12.30%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.2%Best | 13.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.9%Best | -35.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,255 | $17,861Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 70.1% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | New York Life Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 25, 2009 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 25, 2009 to Sep 18, 2026 (17.5 years).
QAI vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17.5 years both funds cover.
QAI vs VYM Performance
NYLIM Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) is an ETF from New York Life Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QAI returned +9.07% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, QAI is up 7.14% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, QAI compounded at +8.00% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +4.15% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +11.41% annualized vs +3.34%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.4% compared with 5.2% for QAI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.9% for QAI and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QAI charges 0.88% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $88 vs $4 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QAI currently yields 1.39% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 33 holdings in QAI and 557 in VYM, totalling 100.1% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in QAI and 557 in VYM, against full books of 129 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 528 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for QAI (97.1% of the fund), and 33 for QAI that do not appear in VYM (100.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QAI and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QAI or VYM?
QAI has an expense ratio of 0.88% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $84 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QAI or VYM?
Over the past year QAI returned +9.07% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), QAI annualized +3.34% vs +11.41% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QAI or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 13.4% annualized versus 5.2% for QAI. Worst drawdown: QAI -14.9% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both QAI and VYM?
QAI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QAI or VYM?
QAI yields 1.39% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than QAI?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.