QIG vs VTI
WisdomTree US Corporate Bond Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QIG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $18M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.99% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 488 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -3.13% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.31% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.52% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.95% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 27, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
QIG vs VTI Performance
WisdomTree US Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QIG returned -1.31% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, QIG is down 3.13% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, QIG compounded at +4.52% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.95% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +1.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 7.0% for QIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.9% for QIG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QIG charges 0.18% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QIG currently yields 4.99% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QIG and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QIG or VTI?
QIG has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QIG or VTI?
Over the past year QIG returned -1.31% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), QIG annualized +1.99% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QIG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 7.0% for QIG. Worst drawdown: QIG -27.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QIG and VTI?
QIG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QIG and VTI?
QIG and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QIG or VTI?
QIG yields 4.99% while VTI yields 1.07%, so QIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.