QQQ vs RDOG
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RDOG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $12M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 6.12% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 46 | |
| YTD Return | +18.31% | +16.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.37% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.79% | +10.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.20% | +2.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 21.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -70.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | ALPS Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 7, 2008 |
QQQ vs RDOG Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.37% while RDOG returned +21.64%. Year to date, QQQ is up 18.31% versus a gain of 16.48% for RDOG.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.79% per year against +10.77% for RDOG; over five years the annualized figures are +15.20% and +2.23% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.10% annualized vs +0.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 21.3% for RDOG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -70.5% for RDOG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RDOG charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $35 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 6.12% for RDOG.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RDOG share 0 holdings out of 146 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RDOG?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RDOG charges 0.35%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RDOG?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.37% vs +21.64% for RDOG, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), QQQ annualized +13.10% vs +0.89% for RDOG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RDOG?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 21.3% for RDOG. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RDOG -70.5%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RDOG?
QQQ and RDOG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RDOG?
QQQ and RDOG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 146 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RDOG?
QQQ yields 0.41% while RDOG yields 6.12%, so RDOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.