QQQ vs RMM
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
Which is better, QQQ or RMM?
Large Cap Growth against Municipal Bond.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RMM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 6.83% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $291M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 7.01% |
| Holdings | 107 | 112 |
| YTD Return | +15.94%Best | +4.86% |
| 1Y Return | +20.44%Best | +5.38% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.86%Best | +3.65% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.26%Best | -1.67% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.0%Best | 35.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.4%Best | -83.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,475Best | $9,192 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | RiverNorth |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Municipal Bond |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jul 25, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 8, 2007 to Sep 14, 2026 (18.9 years).
QQQ vs RMM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs RMM Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (RMM) is an ETF from RiverNorth. Over the past year QQQ returned +20.44% while RMM returned +5.38%. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.94% versus a gain of 4.86% for RMM.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +24.86% per year against +3.65% for RMM; over five years the annualized figures are +14.26% and -1.67% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +15.10% annualized vs -6.63%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RMM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.1% compared with 19.0% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.4% for QQQ and -83.8% for RMM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RMM charges 6.83%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $683 annually, a gap of $665 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 7.01% for RMM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 58 in RMM, totalling 99.9% and 123.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 127 days apart, QQQ as of Aug 5, 2026 and RMM as of Mar 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 58 in RMM, against full books of 107 and 112.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and RMM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RMM?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RMM charges 6.83%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $665 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or RMM?
Over the past year QQQ returned +20.44% vs +5.38% for RMM, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), QQQ annualized +15.10% vs -6.63% for RMM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RMM?
RMM has been the more volatile fund at 35.1% annualized versus 19.0% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -51.4% vs RMM -83.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RMM?
QQQ and RMM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RMM?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RMM yields 7.01%, so RMM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RMM better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.