QQQ vs RNRG
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RNRG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $26M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.71% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 40 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +2.74% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +17.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +3.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | -5.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 19.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 27, 2015 |
QQQ vs RNRG Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while RNRG returned +17.53%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 2.74% for RNRG.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +3.51% for RNRG; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and -5.35% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs -1.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.7% for RNRG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -58.8% for RNRG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RNRG charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $65 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.71% for RNRG.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RNRG share 0 holdings out of 135 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RNRG?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RNRG charges 0.65%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RNRG?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +17.53% for RNRG, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs -1.91% for RNRG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RNRG?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.7% for RNRG. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RNRG -58.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RNRG?
QQQ and RNRG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RNRG?
QQQ and RNRG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 135 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RNRG?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RNRG yields 1.71%, so RNRG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.