QQQ vs SARK
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Tradr 1X Short Innovation Daily ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 1.00% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $38M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 2.81% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 10 | |
| YTD Return | +17.07% | -13.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.39% | -21.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.08% | -32.87% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.18% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 47.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -81.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Tradr ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 5, 2021 |
QQQ vs SARK Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Tradr 1X Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.39% while SARK returned -21.36%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.07% versus a loss of 13.34% for SARK.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.08% per year against -32.87% for SARK. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.05% annualized vs -14.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SARK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 47.3% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -81.3% for SARK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.76. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SARK charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $100 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 2.81% for SARK.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SARK?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SARK charges 1.00%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SARK?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.39% vs -21.36% for SARK, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QQQ annualized +13.05% vs -14.56% for SARK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SARK?
SARK has been the more volatile fund at 47.3% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SARK -81.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SARK?
QQQ and SARK have a monthly-return correlation of -0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SARK?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SARK yields 2.81%, so SARK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.