QQQ vs SAWS
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SAWS?
Large Cap Growth against Small Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. SAWS is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $486.1B | $8M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.02% |
| Holdings | 107 | 75 |
| YTD Return | +17.54%Best | +11.09% |
| 1Y Return | +25.59%Best | +11.21% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.63% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.18% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8%Best | 18.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -22.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $15,440Best | $12,368 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 28.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Small Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jul 30, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 31, 2024 to Sep 4, 2026 (2.1 years).
QQQ vs SAWS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs SAWS Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is an ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.59% while SAWS returned +11.21%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.54% versus a gain of 11.09% for SAWS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAWS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 17.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -22.0% for SAWS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SAWS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $55 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.02% for SAWS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 73 in SAWS, totalling 99.9% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 73 in SAWS, against full books of 107 and 75.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 71 positions for SAWS that do not appear in our book for QQQ (98.0% of the fund), and 96 for QQQ that do not appear in SAWS (97.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SAWS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SAWS?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SAWS charges 0.55%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SAWS?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.59% vs +11.21% for SAWS, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +22.98% vs +10.65% for SAWS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SAWS?
SAWS has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 17.8% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs SAWS -22.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SAWS?
QQQ and SAWS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SAWS?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SAWS yields 0.02%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SAWS better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. SAWS is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.