QQQ vs SBIT
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SBIT?
Large Cap Growth against Trading-Inverse Commodities.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over the full window, SBIT over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SBIT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.97% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $158M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 8.10% |
| Holdings | 107 | 6 |
| YTD Return | +17.95%Best | -17.77% |
| 1Y Return | +21.77% | +23.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.63% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.24% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5%Best | 86.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8%Best | -91.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $16,684Best | $1,523 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | ProShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Trading-Inverse Commodities |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Apr 2, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 2, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.5 years).
QQQ vs SBIT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs SBIT Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year QQQ returned +21.77% while SBIT returned +23.29%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a loss of 17.77% for SBIT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SBIT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 86.2% compared with 17.5% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -91.3% for SBIT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.29. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SBIT charges 0.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $97 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 8.10% for SBIT.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SBIT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SBIT?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SBIT charges 0.97%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $79 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SBIT?
Over the past year QQQ returned +21.77% vs +23.29% for SBIT, so SBIT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SBIT?
SBIT has been the more volatile fund at 86.2% annualized versus 17.5% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs SBIT -91.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SBIT?
QQQ and SBIT have a monthly-return correlation of -0.29, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SBIT?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SBIT yields 8.10%, so SBIT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SBIT better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over the full window, SBIT over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.