QQQ vs SCIN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Schwab International Bond ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SCIN?
SCIN costs less.
SCIN has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SCIN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $437.3B | $25M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 208 | 42 |
| YTD Return | +10.43%Best | +1.42% |
| 1Y Return | +8.78% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.14% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.29% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | - |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Oct 21, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QQQ vs SCIN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs SCIN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab International Bond ETF (SCIN) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, QQQ is up 10.43% versus a gain of 1.42% for SCIN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SCIN charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $6 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.43% against 0.00% for SCIN.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 101 holdings in QQQ and 42 in SCIN, totalling 99.7% and 6.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 42 in SCIN, against full books of 208 and 42.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SCIN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SCIN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SCIN charges 0.06%. SCIN is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SCIN?
QQQ yields 0.43% while SCIN yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCIN better than QQQ?
SCIN has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.