QQQ vs SLWS
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs SLW Short Duration Income ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SLWS?
Large Cap Growth against Short Term Bond.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SLWS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.42% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $388M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 4.08% |
| Holdings | 107 | 202 |
| YTD Return | +21.18%Best | +2.35% |
| 1Y Return | +24.36%Best | +3.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.99% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.39% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Short Term Bond |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Dec 19, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QQQ vs SLWS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs SLWS Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and SLW Short Duration Income ETF (SLWS) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +24.36% while SLWS returned +3.43%. Year to date, QQQ is up 21.18% versus a gain of 2.35% for SLWS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SLWS charges 0.42%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $42 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 4.08% for SLWS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 96 in SLWS, totalling 99.9% and 51.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 96 in SLWS, against full books of 107 and 202.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SLWS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SLWS?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SLWS charges 0.42%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SLWS?
Over the past year QQQ returned +24.36% vs +3.43% for SLWS, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SLWS?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SLWS yields 4.08%, so SLWS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SLWS better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.