QQQ vs SNOV
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs FT Vest US Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SNOV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.90% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $118M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +10.84% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +16.04% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 8.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -15.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 17, 2023 |
QQQ vs SNOV Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and FT Vest US Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while SNOV returned +16.04%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 10.84% for SNOV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 8.2% for SNOV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -15.4% for SNOV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SNOV charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $90 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for SNOV.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SNOV share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SNOV?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SNOV charges 0.90%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SNOV?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +16.04% for SNOV, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +12.18% for SNOV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SNOV?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 8.2% for SNOV. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SNOV -15.4%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SNOV?
QQQ and SNOV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SNOV?
QQQ and SNOV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SNOV?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SNOV yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.