QQQ vs SPDF
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SPDF?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SPDF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.69% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $33M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 107 | 3 |
| YTD Return | +17.95%Best | +9.02% |
| 1Y Return | +21.77% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.63% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.24% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Tamarisk Capital Management, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Apr 14, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QQQ vs SPDF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs SPDF Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF (SPDF) is an ETF from Tamarisk Capital Management, LLC. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a gain of 9.02% for SPDF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SPDF charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $69 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for SPDF.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 1 in SPDF, totalling 99.9% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 1 in SPDF, against full books of 107 and 3.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SPDF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SPDF?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SPDF charges 0.69%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SPDF?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SPDF yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPDF better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.