QQQ vs SPDN

QQQ vs SPDN
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQMore Diversified: QQQ

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQSPDNWinner
Expense Ratio0.18%0.48%
AUM$496.3B$233M
Dividend Yield0.44%3.32%
Holdings1085
YTD Return+17.89%-8.89%
1Y Return+26.35%-12.19%
3Y Return (annualized)+26.02%-12.98%
5Y Return (annualized)+14.59%-8.07%
Volatility (annualized)30.6%14.6%
Max Drawdown-83.0%-76.8%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Direxion Shares ETF Trust
CategoryEquityAlternative
InceptionMar 10, 1999Jun 8, 2016

QQQ vs SPDN Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1X ETF (SPDN) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.35% while SPDN returned -12.19%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.89% versus a loss of 8.89% for SPDN.

Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.02% per year against -12.98% for SPDN; over five years the annualized figures are +14.59% and -8.07% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.07% annualized vs -12.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.6% for SPDN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -76.8% for SPDN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.92. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SPDN charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $48 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 3.32% for SPDN.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

QQQ and SPDN share 0 holdings out of 105 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or SPDN?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SPDN charges 0.48%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.

Which performed better, QQQ or SPDN?

Over the past year QQQ returned +26.35% vs -12.19% for SPDN, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), QQQ annualized +13.07% vs -12.77% for SPDN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, QQQ or SPDN?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.6% for SPDN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SPDN -76.8%.

Should I hold both QQQ and SPDN?

QQQ and SPDN have a monthly-return correlation of -0.92, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SPDN?

QQQ and SPDN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 105 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SPDN?

QQQ yields 0.44% while SPDN yields 3.32%, so SPDN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free