QQQ vs TAGS
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Teucrium Agricultural Fund ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TAGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 1.00% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $20M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +18.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +12.97% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | -3.91% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +0.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 15.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -76.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Teucrium | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Mar 28, 2012 |
QQQ vs TAGS Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund ETF (TAGS) is a ETF from Teucrium. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while TAGS returned +12.97%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 18.66% for TAGS.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against -3.91% for TAGS; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +0.51% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs -4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.7% for TAGS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -76.4% for TAGS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TAGS charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $100 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for TAGS.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and TAGS share 0 holdings out of 106 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TAGS?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TAGS charges 1.00%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or TAGS?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +12.97% for TAGS, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs -4.14% for TAGS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or TAGS?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.7% for TAGS. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs TAGS -76.4%.
Should I hold both QQQ and TAGS?
QQQ and TAGS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TAGS?
QQQ and TAGS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 106 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TAGS?
QQQ yields 0.44% while TAGS yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.