QQQ vs TMNS
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs T. Rowe Price Short Municipal Income ETF
Which is better, QQQ or TMNS?
Large Cap Growth against Short Term Municipal Bond.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TMNS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Tie | 0.18%Tie |
| AUM | $483.5B | $24M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 2.56% |
| Holdings | 107 | 185 |
| YTD Return | +21.71%Best | -0.92% |
| 1Y Return | +25.89% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.80% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.67% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Short Term Municipal Bond |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 19, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QQQ vs TMNS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs TMNS Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and T. Rowe Price Short Municipal Income ETF (TMNS) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Year to date, QQQ is up 21.71% versus a loss of 0.92% for TMNS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TMNS charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $18 annually. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 2.56% for TMNS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 44 in TMNS, totalling 99.9% and 24.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 44 in TMNS, against full books of 107 and 185.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and TMNS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TMNS?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TMNS charges 0.18%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TMNS?
QQQ yields 0.44% while TMNS yields 2.56%, so TMNS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TMNS better than QQQ?
QQQ and TMNS are close on every measure we can compare. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.