QQQ vs XIJN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs FT Vest US Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | XIJN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $52M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 6.97% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 17 | |
| YTD Return | +16.23% | -0.10% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.23% | +1.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.75% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.78% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 1.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -4.7% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 21, 2024 |
QQQ vs XIJN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and FT Vest US Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June (XIJN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% while XIJN returned +1.83%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.23% versus a loss of 0.10% for XIJN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 1.8% for XIJN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -4.7% for XIJN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while XIJN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $85 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 6.97% for XIJN.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and XIJN share 0 holdings out of 107 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or XIJN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while XIJN charges 0.85%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or XIJN?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% vs +1.83% for XIJN, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +13.02% vs +4.92% for XIJN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or XIJN?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 1.8% for XIJN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs XIJN -4.7%.
Should I hold both QQQ and XIJN?
QQQ and XIJN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and XIJN?
QQQ and XIJN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 107 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or XIJN?
QQQ yields 0.44% while XIJN yields 6.97%, so XIJN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.