QQQ vs ZTEN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs F/m 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
ZTEN has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. ZTEN offers more diversification with 264 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | ZTEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $30M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 5.58% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 264 | |
| YTD Return | +16.19% | +0.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.22% | +3.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.34% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 5.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -5.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | F-m investments | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 10, 2024 |
QQQ vs ZTEN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and F/m 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN) is a ETF from F-m investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.22% while ZTEN returned +3.02%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.19% versus a gain of 0.13% for ZTEN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 5.3% for ZTEN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -5.4% for ZTEN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while ZTEN charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $15 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 5.58% for ZTEN.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and ZTEN share 0 holdings out of 147 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or ZTEN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while ZTEN charges 0.15%. ZTEN is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or ZTEN?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.22% vs +3.02% for ZTEN, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QQQ annualized +13.01% vs +4.74% for ZTEN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or ZTEN?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 5.3% for ZTEN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs ZTEN -5.4%.
Should I hold both QQQ and ZTEN?
QQQ and ZTEN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and ZTEN?
QQQ and ZTEN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 147 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or ZTEN?
QQQ yields 0.44% while ZTEN yields 5.58%, so ZTEN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.