QQQ vs ZTEN

QQQ vs ZTEN

Which is better, QQQ or ZTEN?

Large Cap Growth against Long Term Bond.

ZTEN has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: ZTENHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQZTEN
Expense Ratio0.18%0.15%Best
AUM$498.6B$28M
Dividend Yield0.42%5.60%
Holdings321500
YTD Return+22.35%Best-3.36%
1Y Return+22.84%Best-2.56%
3Y Return (annualized)+27.55%-
5Y Return (annualized)+16.36%-
Volatility (annualized)16.9%5.6%Best
Max Drawdown-22.8%-5.8%Best
$10,000 over 2.7 years$18,357Best$10,882
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)F-m investments
CategoryEquityFixed Income
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLong Term Bond
InceptionMar 10, 1999Jan 10, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 11, 2024 to Oct 8, 2026 (2.7 years).

QQQ vs ZTEN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.

QQQ vs ZTEN Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and F/m 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN) is an ETF from F-m investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.84% while ZTEN returned -2.56%. Year to date, QQQ is up 22.35% versus a loss of 3.36% for ZTEN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 5.6% for ZTEN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -5.8% for ZTEN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while ZTEN charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $15 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 5.60% for ZTEN.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 36 in ZTEN, totalling 99.9% and 14.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 36 in ZTEN, against full books of 321 and 500.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QQQ and ZTEN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QQQZTEN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or ZTEN?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while ZTEN charges 0.15%. ZTEN is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QQQ or ZTEN?

Over the past year QQQ returned +22.84% vs -2.56% for ZTEN, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QQQ or ZTEN?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 5.6% for ZTEN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs ZTEN -5.8%.

Should I hold both QQQ and ZTEN?

QQQ and ZTEN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or ZTEN?

QQQ yields 0.42% while ZTEN yields 5.60%, so ZTEN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZTEN better than QQQ?

ZTEN has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.