QXQ vs VTI
SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QXQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QXQ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $83M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 16.06% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +15.19% | +12.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.58% | +20.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Summit Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 14, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
QXQ vs VTI Performance
SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF (QXQ) is a ETF from Summit Global Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QXQ returned +25.58% while VTI returned +20.47%. Year to date, QXQ is up 15.19% versus a gain of 12.79% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QXQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for QXQ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QXQ charges 0.98% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QXQ currently yields 16.06% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QXQ and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QXQ or VTI?
QXQ has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QXQ or VTI?
Over the past year QXQ returned +25.58% vs +20.47% for VTI, so QXQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QXQ annualized +26.62% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QXQ or VTI?
QXQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QXQ -22.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QXQ and VTI?
QXQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QXQ and VTI?
QXQ and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QXQ or VTI?
QXQ yields 16.06% while VTI yields 1.07%, so QXQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.