RFI vs SCHD
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund Inc. vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, RFI or SCHD?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RFI | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $1,524.6 | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.23% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 193 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +2.26% | +21.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.46% | +25.15%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.55% | +15.43%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.79% | +9.32%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.0% | 13.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,611 | $15,613Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.7% | 41.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 27, 1993 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 24, 2026 (14.9 years).
RFI vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
RFI vs SCHD Performance
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund Inc. (RFI) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year RFI returned -3.46% while SCHD returned +25.15%. Year to date, RFI is up 2.26% versus a gain of 21.33% for SCHD.
Over three years, RFI compounded at +8.55% per year against +15.43% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -0.79% and +9.32% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.11% annualized vs +2.72%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RFI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 13.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for RFI and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RFI charges 0.89% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $6 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RFI currently yields 8.23% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
0.5% of RFI's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 0.1% of SCHD's money is in holdings RFI also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 153 days apart, RFI as of Mar 31, 2026 and SCHD as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 157 positions we hold weights for in RFI and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 193 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for RFI (99.9% of the fund), and 155 for RFI that do not appear in SCHD (96.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RFI | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GVMXXState Street Institutional US Government Money Market Fund | 0.50% | 0.06% | 0.44% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RFI and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RFI or SCHD?
RFI has an expense ratio of 0.89% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $83 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RFI or SCHD?
Over the past year RFI returned -3.46% vs +25.15% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), RFI annualized +2.72% vs +11.11% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RFI or SCHD?
RFI has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 13.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: RFI -53.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both RFI and SCHD?
RFI and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RFI or SCHD?
RFI yields 8.23% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so RFI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than RFI?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.