ROMO vs VTI
Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ROMO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.87% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $25M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.41% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.09% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.07% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.85% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.07% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | STRATEGY SHARES | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
ROMO vs VTI Performance
Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) is a ETF from STRATEGY SHARES and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ROMO returned +7.07% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, ROMO is up 10.09% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, ROMO compounded at +11.85% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.07% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 12.9% for ROMO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.7% for ROMO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ROMO charges 0.87% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $87 vs $3 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROMO currently yields 2.41% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ROMO and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ROMO or VTI?
ROMO has an expense ratio of 0.87% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $84 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ROMO or VTI?
Over the past year ROMO returned +7.07% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), ROMO annualized +5.92% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ROMO or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 12.9% for ROMO. Worst drawdown: ROMO -28.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ROMO and VTI?
ROMO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ROMO and VTI?
ROMO and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ROMO or VTI?
ROMO yields 2.41% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ROMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.