SCHD vs SWAN
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | SWAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $103.7B | $157M | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.31% | 3.19% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 14 | |
| YTD Return | +25.62% | +5.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.62% | +11.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.58% | +12.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.63% | +2.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 11.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -31.0% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Amplify ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Nov 5, 2018 |
SCHD vs SWAN Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year SCHD returned +32.62% while SWAN returned +11.65%. Year to date, SCHD is up 25.62% versus a gain of 5.34% for SWAN.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +15.58% per year against +12.85% for SWAN; over five years the annualized figures are +9.63% and +2.36% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.47% annualized vs +6.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 11.8% for SWAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -31.0% for SWAN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while SWAN charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $49 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.31% against 3.19% for SWAN.
Holdings Overlap
SCHD and SWAN share 0 holdings out of 109 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or SWAN?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while SWAN charges 0.49%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCHD or SWAN?
Over the past year SCHD returned +32.62% vs +11.65% for SWAN, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), SCHD annualized +11.47% vs +6.09% for SWAN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCHD or SWAN?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 11.8% for SWAN. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs SWAN -31.0%.
Should I hold both SCHD and SWAN?
SCHD and SWAN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and SWAN?
SCHD and SWAN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 109 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or SWAN?
SCHD yields 3.31% while SWAN yields 3.19%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.