SCHD vs UMAR
SCHD vs UMAR
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | UMAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $103.7B | $194M | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.31% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +24.26% | +7.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.38% | +12.60% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.08% | +12.45% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.72% | +7.92% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 6.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -11.1% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Innovator ETFs Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Feb 28, 2020 |
SCHD vs UMAR Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year SCHD returned +31.38% while UMAR returned +12.60%. Year to date, SCHD is up 24.26% versus a gain of 7.31% for UMAR.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +15.08% per year against +12.45% for UMAR; over five years the annualized figures are +9.72% and +7.92% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs +7.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 6.0% for UMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -11.1% for UMAR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while UMAR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $79 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.31% against 0.00% for UMAR.
Holdings Overlap
SCHD and UMAR share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or UMAR?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while UMAR charges 0.79%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $73 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCHD or UMAR?
Over the past year SCHD returned +31.38% vs +12.60% for UMAR, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), SCHD annualized +11.39% vs +7.83% for UMAR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCHD or UMAR?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 6.0% for UMAR. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs UMAR -11.1%.
Should I hold both SCHD and UMAR?
SCHD and UMAR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and UMAR?
SCHD and UMAR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or UMAR?
SCHD yields 3.31% while UMAR yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.