SDOW vs VTI
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SDOW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $177M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.42% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -26.41% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | -40.15% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -59.28% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -44.36% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 9, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
SDOW vs VTI Performance
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SDOW returned -40.15% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, SDOW is down 26.41% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, SDOW compounded at -59.28% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -44.36% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs -43.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SDOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for SDOW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.84. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SDOW charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SDOW currently yields 5.42% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SDOW and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SDOW or VTI?
SDOW has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SDOW or VTI?
Over the past year SDOW returned -40.15% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), SDOW annualized -43.26% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SDOW or VTI?
SDOW has been the more volatile fund at 42.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SDOW -100.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SDOW and VTI?
SDOW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SDOW and VTI?
SDOW and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SDOW or VTI?
SDOW yields 5.42% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SDOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.